Supreme Court rejects Trump order. What is birthright citizenship?
The U.S. Supreme Court on June 30 struck down President Donald Trump's plan to end birthright citizenship for some children born in the United States, voting 6-3 that his executive order violates the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
On his first day back in office, Trump signed an executive order ending automatic citizenship for children born in the United States if neither of their parents is lawfully in the country as a key part of his efforts to remove millions of immigrants from the country, a policy change that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has also advocated.
The order was immediately challenged through multiple lawsuits filed by expectant parents, immigrant rights groups and 22 state attorneys general, and was blocked in federal court. In June last year, the high court voted 6-3 to lift the temporary blocks on Trump's order but did not comment at the time on its constitutionality, simply ruling that the federal judge exceeded their authority.
In other immigration cases, including last week's ruling allowing Trump to end deportation protections for hundreds of thousands of immigrants, the Supreme Court justices backed the president's authority.
In their latest decision, however, the justices said Trump cannot change the definition of birthright citizenship with the stroke of a pen. Trump's push to make that change upended how the constitutional guarantee – long considered a bedrock American principle – had historically been understood.
"The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land'," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority. "We keep that promise today."
Birthright citizenship was enshrined in the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1866 and was upheld by the Supreme Court more than 125 years ago.
What is birthright citizenship?
Birthright citizenship means anyone born in a country is automatically a citizen of that country. Such people are called "natural citizens." Different countries with birthright citizenship laws may have different restrictions for eligibility.
Birthright citizenship was part of English common law and referred to as jus soli ("right of the soil").
Is birthright citizenship in the U.S. Constitution?
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was passed in 1866, less than a year after the end of the Civil War. Among other things, it overruled the previous Dred Scott ruling stating that enslaved people, even if born here, could never become citizens of the United States.
The very first sentence of the amendment is the Citizenship Clause:
The rest of the first section grants citizenship to all persons "born or naturalized in the United States," including formerly enslaved people, and provides them with "equal protection of the laws" while preventing states from passing laws to deprive them of it.
Trump contends that "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" rules out children born to parents who aren't citizens because they may feel loyal to a foreign country even if they're living in this one.
He directed federal agencies not to recognize the citizenship of babies born in the U.S. who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also known as a "green card" holder. Even if it wasn't made retroactive, the move would have dramatically increased the number of the undocumented population subject to arrest and deportation.
Florida Gov. DeSantis also wanted to end birthright citizenship
Gov. Ron DeSantis said that birthright citizenship "doesn't make sense" as early as 2018 when he was stull just a candidate for the job.
"I tend to think that the original interpretation of [the Fourteenth Amendment] would not apply," DeSantis said in a CBS interview. "But I think most of the court decisions kind of move in the direction of, `Hey, if you're born here, you are due it.' But I do think it would be good to have the court finally resolve it.
"I don't know if [Trump] can do it by executive order, but obviously if he did do it that would be tested immediately, and we would get a resolution," he said then.
DeSantis unsuccessfully campaigned against Trump for the Republican nomination for president in 2023 and made harsher immigration laws, including an end to birthright citizenship, central to his campaign.
"This idea that you can come across the border, two days later have a child and somehow that's an American citizen, that was not the original understanding of the 14th Amendment, and so we'll take action to force a clarification of that," DeSantis said in 2023, criticizing what he described as "birth tourism."
Do any other countries besides the U.S. have birthright citizenship?
Currently, 36 countries, including the U.S., and two territories have some sort of birthright citizenship, according to worldpopulationreview.com. Nearly all of them are in North, Central, or South America, possibly due to colonizing European countries hoping to entice settlers to the New World with relaxed, immigration-friendly laws.
Who is not a citizen even if they were born in the United States?
According to the American Immigration Council, before the executive order, American birthright citizenship was available to anyone born in the U.S. except for:
- Children of foreign diplomats
- Children born to soldiers considered enemy invaders during a hostile occupation of the U.S.
- People born in American Samoa's unincorporated territories
Indigenous peoples born in the U.S. were excluded until the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924.
Has the Supreme Court ruled before on birthright citizenship?
Yes, in two notable cases.
In 1898, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, after the U.S.-born Wong took a trip to China and was refused re-entry to the United States. Up until 1882, there were no immigration laws in the U.S., so it hadn't been an issue before. The Chinese Exclusion Acts restricted Chinese immigration and prohibited Chinese immigrants from becoming naturalized citizens.
In a 6-2 ruling that has stood the test of time, the court determined that because he was born on U.S. soil and his parents were not "employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China," Wong was a U.S. citizen.
The court ruled again in 1982 when Texas attempted to withhold education funds for the children of undocumented immigrants. In Plyler v. Doe, the court reasoned that undocumented immigrants are people "in any ordinary sense of the term" and are consequently afforded 14th Amendment protections.
Both cases, and several more, figured prominently in the latest decision.
Maureen Groppe, USA TODAY, contributed to this story.
C. A. Bridges is a journalist for the USA TODAY Network-Florida's service journalism Connect team. You can get all of Florida's best content directly in your inbox each weekday by signing up for the free newsletter, Florida TODAY.
(This story was updated to add new information.)
This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: Supreme Court rejects Trump order. What is birthright citizenship?
Reporting by C. A. Bridges, USA TODAY NETWORK - Florida / Tallahassee Democrat
USA TODAY Network via Reuters Connect
Copyright Reuters or USA Today Network via Reuters Connect
This story was originally published June 30, 2026 at 11:10 AM.